1. Is the task appropriate to the assignment? The task is very appropriate to this assignment because it was complete and user friendly instructions of how to do something.
2. Is all necessary information included? Yes, all the information given was appropriate and to the point, regarding the topic.
3. Does the introduction successfully orient the reader to the task ahead? Yes, the introduction was orient to the reader to the task ahead because the topic was clearly introduced.
4. Are the major steps and sub-steps of the process clearly organized? Yes, everything was clearly organized and the steps are very easy to understand. However, on page five, on the second sentence, you had a minor typo. *Change the (2) to (1).
5. Is each step or sub-step explained separately? Yes, she separated the sub-steps by giving each step it's own page.
6. Is the audience addressed directly? Yes, the audience being addressed is "any women who wants to look good without spending too much time and money doing it."
7. Do the graphics and other visual cues of the document make the information more accessible? Yes, the graphics used match well with the information provided for each step. Perhaps, using a before and after picture would enhance the overall instructions.
8. Is the style clear, concise, and active? Yes, the style is consistent, the color scheme is appropriate, and it's eye catching.
9. Are the instructions free from disconcerting mechanical errors, such as spelling and grammatical mistakes? Yes, there were no grammatical errors and I only noticed one mistake but it is mentioned above.
3 comments:
1. Is the task appropriate to the assignment?
The task is very appropriate to this assignment because it was complete and user friendly instructions of how to do something.
2. Is all necessary information included?
Yes, all the information given was appropriate and to the point, regarding the topic.
3. Does the introduction successfully orient the reader to the task ahead?
Yes, the introduction was orient to the reader to the task ahead because the topic was clearly introduced.
4. Are the major steps and sub-steps of the process clearly organized?
Yes, everything was clearly organized and the steps are very easy to understand. However, on page five, on the second sentence, you had a minor typo.
*Change the (2) to (1).
5. Is each step or sub-step explained separately?
Yes, she separated the sub-steps by giving each step it's own page.
6. Is the audience addressed directly?
Yes, the audience being addressed is "any women who wants to look good without spending too much time and money doing it."
7. Do the graphics and other visual cues of the document make the information more accessible?
Yes, the graphics used match well with the information provided for each step. Perhaps, using a before and after picture would enhance the overall instructions.
8. Is the style clear, concise, and active?
Yes, the style is consistent, the color scheme is appropriate, and it's eye catching.
9. Are the instructions free from disconcerting mechanical errors, such as spelling and grammatical mistakes?
Yes, there were no grammatical errors and I only noticed one mistake but it is mentioned above.
-Overall, well done!
Thank you so much for your peer review of my instructions and for catching that one minor error. I appreciate your input.
I made the change and re-posted my link as Revision #1. Thanks again!
Post a Comment